Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case law at both the federal and state levels.

Case regulation is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.

Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to acquiring sexually molested the couple’s son several times.

The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. While in the meantime police shall remain neutral during the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall get prompt action against them under regulation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more

In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may exist conflicts between the assorted lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

The justices must be balanced between the political parties, this kind of that neither party has an advantage of more than one seat. To qualify to provide within the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice legislation in New Jersey for a minimum of ten years. This is the same prerequisite as for Superior Court judges.

five hundred,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) each along with the same shall be held in the police station for the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

Executing a case law search can be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which include:

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the discovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a nicely-founded famous criminal law cases proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.